SBV drafts regulations on a testing mechanism for Fintech
SBV’s bill issuance not a signal of monetary policy reversal: analysts | |
Credit institutions can immediately redeem sold corporate bonds | |
SBV injects large amount of money to support capital for banks |
According to the draft report submitted to the Government by the SBV, the world banking sector in general and the Vietnamese banking sector in particular have witnessed a strong application of new technologies associated with the achievements of the industrial revolution 4.0 such as cloud computing, big data analysis, blockchain, artificial intelligence (AI)... into business models, product and service supply of banks and credit institutions to improve operational efficiency and increase customer experience, ensuring transactions safe, quick, convenient with suitable services and reasonable costs.
In Vietnam, the financial technology (Fintech) trend is also clearly shown through the participation of technology startups and non-bank organizations with technological strengths in various activities in the banking and finance sector (Fintech company).
The Fintech field has a lot of development potential. Illustrative photo: ST |
In fact, in our country's market, there are many Fintech companies participating in the financial sector such as providing payment intermediary services, peer-to-peer lending (P2P Lending), credit scoring, and personal finance management.
In particular, the Fintech field also attracts a large amount of domestic and foreign investments.
However, the SBV believes that the rapid development and expansion of the scope of Fintech without a comprehensive legal framework or specific legal regulations may have potential risks and negative consequences on some aspects such as fair competition, financial stability, consumer rights protection, and network security
For example, in the P2P Lending activity that has emerged in Vietnam recently, some companies in the name of the P2P Lending model take advantage of people's lack of knowledge and understanding to deceive and give misleading advertisements and promises about high profits and high interest rates to defraud and usurp people's capital to invest in this loan model or deceive borrowers about "low interest rates" and loan incentives while real interest rates are exorbitantly high, that negatively impact people's lives.
Some agreements between participating parties in the P2P Lending model (P2P Lending company and investors, P2P Lending company and third parties, P2P Lending company and borrowers...) lack clarity and transparency, legally binding, and monitoring and post-inspection mechanism for the borrower's use and management of loan capital for the right purposes, which can lead to disputes and complaints between the parties.
SBV has proposed six policies to concretize into detailed regulations in the draft decree.The six policies are conditions for registering to participate in the Testing Mechanism; testing implementation; risk control; ensuring the legitimate rights and interests of businesses, consumers, and related entities; on post-test processing; and transition processing. |
Therefore, along with world trends, the SBV believes that Vietnam needs to soon build a management framework in the form of a decree stipulating a testing mechanism for Fintech activities to promote innovation, creation, restrict unfair competition, prevent legal violations in the name of Fintech, and protect the interests of service users.
At the same time, the process of applying this framework provides a practical basis for relevant State management agencies to amend and supplement current regulations, complete the legal framework, and promulgate management regulations toward facilitation and adaption to Fintech activities in the banking sector in the future.
Accordingly, in the draft decree, the SBV has proposed a number of risk management policies through: Regulations on the responsibilities of participants in the Testing Mechanism in building a full risk management framework, protecting service users; Regulations on responsibilities for information and reports of organizations participating in the Testing Mechanism; Regulations on the authority and responsibility of State management agencies (including the Ministry of Public Security) in the process of receiving, appraising and evaluating applications for participating in the Testing Mechanism along with inspection and supervision during the operation of the Testing Mechanism...
The SBV believes that these regulations are intended to ensure that the testing process of Fintech solutions is always closely monitored and supervised by management agencies and participants in the Testing Mechanism implement the best measures to prevent and prevent risks from arising (if any).
But during the testing process, the participants will have to be closely monitored, monitored, and comprehensively evaluated by State management agencies, thereby controlling arising risks (if any), better protecting customers' interests, while avoiding negative impacts compared to large-scale, long-term deployment.
Currently, the SBV is gathering comments on the draft decree including five Chapters and 24 Articles.
Related News
State-owned commercial banking sector performs optimistic growth, but more capital in need
09:28 | 31/10/2024 Finance
Difficulty in finding banks eligible to receive compulsory transfers
15:49 | 25/10/2024 Finance
Pressure on exchange rate plunges
18:02 | 01/09/2024 Finance
Increase defense against fraud in the financial and banking sector
10:14 | 14/08/2024 Finance
Latest News
Regularly check tax obligations to avoid temporary exit suspension
09:47 | 21/11/2024 Regulations
Implementing the SAFE framework in Vietnam: Assessment through the lens of international standards
09:14 | 20/11/2024 Regulations
Proposing the Tax Authority be flexible in applying tax debt enforcement measures simultaneously
09:40 | 19/11/2024 Regulations
Many shortcomings in process and manual book on handling administrative violations
15:53 | 18/11/2024 Regulations
More News
Implementing the SAFE Framework in Vietnam: Lessons from practice
10:03 | 18/11/2024 Regulations
Implementing the SAFE Framework in Vietnam: Solutions and Recommendations
09:18 | 17/11/2024 Regulations
Abolishing regulations on tax exemption for small-value imported goods must comply with international practices
13:54 | 15/11/2024 Regulations
Policy adaptation and acceleration of digital transformation in tax and customs management
10:03 | 14/11/2024 Regulations
Implement regulations on special preferential import tariffs under VIFTA
08:32 | 13/11/2024 Regulations
Perfecting tax policy for goods traded via e-commerce
09:24 | 10/11/2024 Regulations
Are belongings of foreigners on business trip to Vietnam exempt from tax?
14:23 | 09/11/2024 Regulations
Amending regulations on enforcement measures in tax administration
10:05 | 08/11/2024 Regulations
Customs procedures for import and export goods during system disruptions
15:11 | 07/11/2024 Regulations
Your care
Regularly check tax obligations to avoid temporary exit suspension
09:47 | 21/11/2024 Regulations
Implementing the SAFE framework in Vietnam: Assessment through the lens of international standards
09:14 | 20/11/2024 Regulations
Proposing the Tax Authority be flexible in applying tax debt enforcement measures simultaneously
09:40 | 19/11/2024 Regulations
Many shortcomings in process and manual book on handling administrative violations
15:53 | 18/11/2024 Regulations
Implementing the SAFE Framework in Vietnam: Lessons from practice
10:03 | 18/11/2024 Regulations